Preparation of Geometry Models for Mesh Generation and CFD
14 www.cadence.com
18. Sederberg, M.T., & Sederberg, T.W., "T-Splines: A Technology for Marine Design with Minimal Control Points," Chesapeake
Powerboat Symposium, Annapolis, MD, March 2010.
19. Thomas, D.C., Engvall, L., Schmidt, S.K., Tew, K., & Scott, M.A., "U-splines: Splines Over Unstructured Meshes," https://
coreform.com/technology/u-splines/.
20. Catmull, E., & Clark, J., "Recursively Generated B-Spline Surfaces on Arbitrary Topological Meshes," Computer-Aided
Design, Vol. 10, Iss. 6, pg. 350, 1978.
21. Doo, D., & Sabin, M., "Behaviour of Recursive Division Surfaces Near Extraordinary Points," Computer-Aided Design, pg
356, 1978.
22. Cashman, T.J., "NURBS-compatible Subdivision Surfaces," University of Cambridge Computer Lab Technical Report
UCAM-CL-TR-773, March 2010.
23. Ben-Chen, M., & Lai Lin, A., "Subdivision Surfaces," course notes for Geometry Processing Algorithms CS468 at Stanford
University, September 2010. http://graphics.stanford.edu/courses/cs468-10-fall/LectureSlides/10_Subdivision.pdf
24. Chakravorty, D., "STL File Format (3D Printing) – Simply Explained," https://all3dp.com/what-is-stl-file-format-extension-
3d-printing/, February 2019.
25. Castro, M.A., Putman, C.M., & Cebral, J.R., "Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of Intracranial Aneurysms: Effects of
Parent Artery Segmentation on Intra-Aneurysmal Hemodynamics," AJNR Am J Neuroradiology 27:1703-09, September
2006.
26. "X-38 First Flight," https://nescacademy.nasa.gov/video/5f1d100e3bc444d1ab77229264cfc3c81d
27. Marussig, B., & Hughes, T.J.R., "A Review of Trimming in Isogeometric Analysis: Challenges, Data Exchange and Simulation
Aspects," Arch Computat Methods Eng, DOI 10.1007/s11831-017-9220-9, 2017.
28. "Implicit Surfaces and Solid Representations," Princeton University https://www.cs.princeton.edu/courses/archive/
spring14/cos426/lectures/09-implicit.pdf, 2014.
29. "Engineering Software Built for Digital Manufacturing," https://ntopology.com/ntop-platform/
30. Muelaner, J., "Implicit Modeling for Complex Geometry," 3D CAD World, February 2020, https://www.3dcadworld.com/
implicit-modelling-for-complex-geometry/.
31. https://www.rhino3d.com/opennurbs
32. https://www.resolvedanalytics.com/theflux/comparing-cfd-software-part-1-cad-embedded-cfd
33. Gammon, M., "Why CAD Geometry Is Not CAE Geometry," Tetrahedron Workshop VI, October 2019.
34. Hu, Y., Zhou, Q., Gao, X., Jacobson, A., Zorbin, D., & Panozzo, D., "Tetrahedral Meshing in the Wild," ACM Trans. Graph., Vol.
37, No. 4, Article 1, August 2018.
35. Chawner, J.R., Dannenhoffer, J.F., III, & Taylor, N.J., "Geometry, Mesh Generation, and the CFD 2030 Vision," AIAA paper
no. 2016-3485, June 2016.
36. OpenVSP
37. Haimes, R. & Dannenhoffer, J.F. III, "The Engineering Sketch Pad: A Solid-Modeling, Feature-Based, Web-Enabled System
for Building Parametric Geometry," AIAA paper no. 2013-3073, June 2013.
38. Urick, B., & Marussig, B., "Why CAD Surface Geometry is Inexact," https://blog.pointwise.com/2017/11/29/why-cad-sur-
face-geometry-is-inexact/, November 2017.
39. Park, M.A., Krakos, J.A., Michal, T., Loseille, A., & Alonso, J.J., "Unstructured Grid Adaptation: Status, Potential Impacts,
and Recommended Investments Toward CFD Vision 2030," AIAA paper no. 2016-3323, June 2016.
40. Beall, M.W., Walsh, J., & Shephard, M.S., "Accessing CAD Geometry for Mesh Generation," SCOREC Report 2003-1, January
2003.
41. Wong, K., "Defeaturing CAD Models: Different Strokes for Different Folks," https://www.digitalengineering247.com/article/
different-strokes-different-folks/, January 2018.
