AWR eBooks

RF Electronics: Design and Simulation

Issue link: https://resources.system-analysis.cadence.com/i/1325428

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 171 of 406

RF Electronics Chapter 5: Frequency Mixers Page 158 2022, C. J. Kikkert, James Cook University, ISBN 978-0-6486803-9-0. Figure 5.77 shows the Frater Gilbert Cell connected as a down-conversion mixer, with a stepped LO input power to determine the conversion gain. Figure 5.78 shows the resulting conversion gain. The LO and RF frequencies are chosen to be the same as that for the microwave mixers of figure 5.53 and 5.56. The Frater-Gilbert Cell mixer is different from the diode mixers in that the best performance is obtained when the LO signal does not cause saturation in the transistors of the Frater-Gilbert Cell. Comparing figure 5.78 with figure 5.34, shows that the slope of conversion gain versus LO power is much larger for the Frater-Gilbert Cell mixer in figure 5.73 than for the DBM in figure 5.26. As a result, variations in AM noise on the LO will cause more of this AM noise to appear on the IF signal in the Frater-Gilbert Cell mixer than in the DBM. Figure 5.78 shows that the largest signal that can be used without the mixer saturating too much is about -6 dBm and that level of LO power has been used for the subsequent measurements. Using a lower LO power gives more ideal mixer action but reduces the conversion gain. Figure 5.79. IF spectrum of the Frater-Gilbert Cell mixer of figure 5.77 as a down-converter. Figure 5.80. Frater-Gilbert Cell up-conversion mixer for RF=-30 dBm. Figure 5.79 shows the IF output spectrum of the mixer as a down-converter. The LO power is -6 dBm and the RF level is -20 dBm. To enable a comparison to be made, the RF Electronics: Design and Simulation 158 www.cadence.com/go/awr

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

view archives of AWR eBooks - RF Electronics: Design and Simulation