AWR eBooks

RF Electronics: Design and Simulation

Issue link: https://resources.system-analysis.cadence.com/i/1325428

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 273 of 406

RF Electronics Chapter 7: RF Filters Page 260 2022, C. J. Kikkert, James Cook University, ISBN 978-0-6486803-9-0. Figure 7.79 shows the frequency response of the four filters at the harmonics of the 1 GHz passband. For the direct-coupled resonator filter the lengths of the coupling lines was 12.5% of a wavelength, which is half of the length of the coupling lines used for the filter in figure 7.73. This resulted in a lower harmonic attenuation. The direct-coupled filter has the best close-in stopband attenuation, but the worst stopband attenuation above 2 times the centre frequency. The second harmonic response from the hairpin filter is significant, but can be removed using harmonic stubs. The interdigital filter does not have a significant harmonic response, but it does not have a very good stopband attenuation either. The stopband attenuation for interdigital filters does not significantly improve with filter order. The Combline filter is the smallest, occupying 41 x 60 mm. The interdigital filter is slightly larger occupying 42 x 60 mm. The direct-coupled resonator filter, occupies 75 x 60 mm and the hairpin filter is the largest, occupying 78 x 68 mm. Figures 7.80 to 7.81 show the hardware of the four filters, approximately to the same scale. The Combline filter is slightly smaller than the interdigital filter, but in most instances, there is not enough space saving to warrant the worse stopband attenuation. Figure 7.80. Interdigital filter hardware. Figure 7.81. Combline filter hardware. (42x60mm) (41x60mm) Figure 7.82. Direct-coupled filter hardware. (75x60mm). RF Electronics: Design and Simulation 260 www.cadence.com/go/awr

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

view archives of AWR eBooks - RF Electronics: Design and Simulation